Mar 10
10
Hey everyone. Interested in learning about some of the new features of 3ds Max 2011? Check out these videos:
http://area.autodesk.com/3dsmax2011
- Scott
Feb 10
24
Hey All. I wanted to let you all know of the first change that has happened, and now I shall. As of this past Monday, February 22nd, I am the Regional Revit Specialist for the North-East region at Gensler. I’m responsible for helping the offices of this region (as well as the firm as a whole) further their integration and implementation of Revit and build a library of resources that includes content, learning, support and more. I’m very excited to get started and hope, as I go, to continue learning.
Change number two is…coming soon…
Feb 10
15
Hey All. While I can’t give you details just yet, there are some changes in the works, one of which I can tell you about next week and the other in three to four weeks. Stay tuned!
Jan 10
8
Hey All. My Pratt class ended a few weeks ago and there was one thing that I couldn’t quite get to work in the last class. We were using a daylight system and mental ray physical sky, but wanted to use our own, custom, background image. I promised the students I would research the problem and let them know how to do it. I immediately did some research and found, ironically on a the blog of a friend of mine, the solution. His name is Roger Liucci and his website is Revit Zen at http://revitzen.blogspot.com. Roger gave me permission to write-up his posting so I thank him for that.
First of all, I’m going to assume that you have already added a daylight system and have therefore had 3ds Max automatically insert an mr Physical Sky into the environment map. Once you do this, if you hit render (after adding a plane and box with basic, light-gray materials, and set the time of day to 2pm), it would look like this:
That looks pretty good. If I change the time of day, month, year, geographic location, etc., that background would change accordingly. To change that background to an image of our choice, we need to modify the mr Physical Sky that was placed into the environment map. Here’s how:
1. Click the Rendering pull-down menu and click Environment (you could also have tapped the 8 key on your keyboard).
2. Next, click the Material Editor icon
(you could also have tapped the m key on your keyboard).
3. Within the Environment and Effects dialog box, left-click and hold on the ( mr Physical Sky ) button and drag and drop it onto an empty slot within the Material Editor:
4. When the Instance (Copy)… dialog box appears, select Instance and click OK. You select Instance because you want all settings that you change in the Material Editor to have the same settings as the mr Physical Sky within the Environment Map.
5. Select the map you just added to the Material Editor and, when the settings appear below, select the box to the left of the Use Custom Background Map option and then click the None button.
6. When the Material/Map Browser appears, double-click Bitmap.
7. Locate the image file you’d like to use as a background and double-click it.
Roger now writes, “One would think this is all that’s necessary, but it still won’t show up correctly.” He’s absolutely right. If we render it right now, it looks like this:
The next step that Roger wrote was exactly what I had left out when I taught my students (so pay attention):
8. Back within the Environment and Effects dialog box, within the mr Photographic Exposure Control group, underneath where it says Physical Scale, select Unitless and set the value to 100000. If we render it now, it looks like this:
This looks better, but you probably notice that the original horizon is cutting through the image. To get rid of this, follow these steps:
9. Reselect the daylight system and, on the Command Panel, switch to the Modify tab.
10. Scroll down and, within the mr Sky Advanced Paramters group, remove the check next to Aerial Perspective:
This is what it’ll look like if we render it now:
If you find that your image is too large, needs to be cropped or needs to be shifted, return to the bitmap settings within the Material Editor and edit any of the settings highlighted within the following image:
Again, thanks VERY much to Roger Liucci of RevitZen (and by the way, here’s the direct link to his post: http://revitzen.blogspot.com/2009/01/visualization-in-max-takes-practice.html). I hope this was helpful to you all and especially to my four students from the Fall ’09 semester.
It’s New Years Eve day and I’m sitting in front of my laptop about to scan through the 214 new articles in the 321 blogs that I subscribe to. As you can see off to the right, if you scroll down a bit, I have my blogs categorized by topics. When I go through the new articles each day I find that I scroll through the CAD-based blogs to mark them all off as “read,” almost without even reading their headlines. I simply no longer have any interest in reading about the latest developments, issues, plug-ins, etc. within the world of AutoCAD (and this is coming from the guy who runs CADuzer.com). Now that I’m back on a Revit-based project (and it is a full-fledged, no exceptions Revit-based project), I can’t imagine going back to AutoCAD. To be clear, I have no problem continuing to use AutoCAD for tasks here and there, but I’m just simply not interested in reading about the solutions people have come up with for it, the latest service packs or updates or new beta programs and versions of it. I think the software should be put out to pasture. I think any further development for it should be finished and then discontinued. Again, to be clear, AutoCAD has been a wonderful program for many years and has suited the architecture industry very well. This reminds me of what many people these days say when they talk about how the Internet is killing newspapers. You know what? It is! That’s called progress! With all of the advances that have come in recent versions of AutoCAD, such as parametric objects, it is inching closer and closer to Revit. Well, we’ve got Revit…it’s called Revit. Anyway, that’s a long way of saying, I’m thinking about removing my “CAD” blogs category.
Hey All. I want to go through a few key things you should think about when starting a Revit-based project. I have to say, first of all, let’s start referring to these projects as a “Revit-based Project” as opposed to a “Revit Project”. I think it takes the emphasis off of what type of software is being used and puts it, more appropriately, on the fact that it’s an architectural project. Anyway, here are five things that you should consider, and document, when starting a project:
While these are just five things to consider, there are many others as well. At its heart, however, this is both a preparation-based as well as a future planning-based process. Considering these things will eliminate confusion and will provide a road-map for working on a Revit-based project.
Hey All. I just went through this tutorial over at the HOK BIM Solutions blog on how to create parametric forms within the conceptual mass environment of Revit Architecture 2010. Take a look:
http://hokbimsolutions.blogspot.com/2009/07/creating-parametric-forms-using-revit.html
Nov 09
20
Hey all. If you look just above, you’ll notice that there is a new section called Forums. Please join and make your voice heard. Hopefully we can get some good conversations started and make it a useful place for seeking and answering questions. I’ve created some basic categories but would be happy to add some more. Send me an email with your suggestions.
Thanks!
Nov 09
18
Mar 10
15
Change #2 – CADuzer becomes BIMuzer
Hey All. Change #2 is here and it’s a doozy!! After around 15 years of identifying with the name “CADuzer,” it is time to change to that which I have been preaching for a while now…BIMuzer. I want to thank Gregory Arkin of Revit3D (http://bimboom.blogspot.com/) for his very generous gift of this domain name. As you can see, there have been a couple of issues in the transfer, but, it gives me a good opportunity to recreate the site. Stay tuned…
Posted in Commentary by Scott. No Comments